Investigation of Police Brutality and problems behind it

investigating of Police Brutality and problems behind itLaw en multitudement has established to be an strategic part in modern day society. The fair play enforcer more(prenominal) comm entirely kn induce as the legal philosophy officer has the primary functions to struggle crime and maintain the peace in an effective and efficient manner. over the last decades the role of the law enforcer has evolved which has provided researchers the opportunity to explore and write up the nature of policing by the utilization of specific shams. Most researchers shake off place a trend in the increased heel of cocktail dresss related to law fellity which be widely distributedly blamed for the presence of highly regarded realize that exist deep d testify the law enforcement socialisation.This horticulture studys that force is justified beca drill it should be able to protect the rights of innocent genteelians.In todays law enforcement culture sinfuls ar profiled by their colou r, race, age, religion, affectionate status and their ethnicity this increases the like hood of innocent members of the humans to become potential targets of the practice of law force.International and domestic outrage was expressed over the Abner Louima case in 1997, which involved the wrongful arrest and pang of a Haitian immigrant by local constabulary officers. The exposition of the case will utilize Deontology as the framework for understanding the honourable dilemma that is present in the Abner Louima case.This essay will also seek to take apart good problems that be present identifying deontology as the honest theory to rate the problems.Inherent ethical problem and dilemma in the case all(prenominal) modern day society has law enforcement forming an integral part of the customary life. Researchers have identified that the nature of the policing is made up of particular models. The closely discussed model is the crime hoagie that sees every criminal to be th e adversary (Dudley, 2001). The natural law officer is deemed as the protectors of the citizens by enforcing the law. An equally discussed model is the fatality operator model this model describes the practice of law officer as the somebody who must respond to an emergency situation, whilst enforcing the law in the given situation, such as a drink driving offence.A less discussed model is the social peacekeeper model which investigates and resolves the root causes of criminal behavior, this model aims to provide an news report of the law enforcement institution and how it operators with multiply expectations, roles and responsibilities.A commonly discussed model which is highlighted in most modern day movies is the social enforcer model which justifies the use of intimidation and exploitation techniques to achieve the objectives of the law enforcement institution.In the case of Abner Louima it is unpatterned that the ethical dilemma is the portrayal of the law officers in qu estion, the crime fighter model is by far the greatest influential model indoors the law enforcement institution and has created a strong cultural acceptance dictating that criminals are dealt with harshly. then introducing an ethical dilemma with the Abner Louima case.Deontological EthicsDeontology moots that human beings act in an ethical manner if they have the motivation and appeal from a high source (Salzmann, 1995). This empowers the individual to feel needed and powerful within the society.Deontology provides an chronicle of ethics to be found on regulations and rules that are established within society (Beauchamp, 1991). This implies that ones actions are deemed to be morally acceptable if the reason is found on social, legal and political legislation that exists within the society. Within these ethical regions obeying these legislations provides evidence that the actions of individuals are acceptable.The police brutishity in the Abner Louima case highlights the bane that police brutality poses against the st efficacy of society because it fosters a climate of detestation towards criminals and suspects. This in turn leads to the retributive justice approach to every criminal offence and offender. It is considered this retributive justice approach will inhibit the tycoon for the law enforcement institution to effectively fight crime.Deontology provide be successfully used to identify and assess the nature of the problem. Police officers have created their own sub culture that is identified with specific values and ideals. These ideals legitimize the act of coercion and intimidation against criminal suspects. Deontology would take the view that police actions are immoral in nature because they go against established rules and regulations. They violate the civil liberties of human beings by creating distrust and irresolution towards them.AnalysisThe police have an institutional culture which comprises of diverse values and attitudes. This cul ture contains hazards that lead to an pick code of conduct among police officers. This culture influences the operating procedures for police force-out in society. The common elements of this culture have been closely associated with belligerency, violence, and aggression (Dudley, 2001).The presentation of new police officers does not influence this sub culture and they can only flourish through proper education from senior police officers. These officers out musical note the code of conduct towards criminal elements which is essential to adhere in send for new officers to survive in their new environment. The individual gender, race, social status and ethnicity play a critical role in pliant police officers attitudes and notions (Bayley, 2005).The institutional culture perceives minorities as being a holy terror to police authority. Any acts of disrespect for police authority by minorities are responded with a harsh approach. Excessive use of force becomes legitimized in say to punish the criminals.In the case of Abner Louima, Justin Volpe was the police officer who assaulted Abner Louima and charged him with mixed false offenses. Abner Louima was arrested and placed into police custody and repeatedly beaten and tormented by a number of police officers.Deontology would argue that such acts are not justified. The current US legal system places a number of restrictions on police behavior. This is done in order to safeguard the interests of the individual. The institutional culture tends to perceive the due process as a chemical mechanism that safeguards the criminals. Hence the application of force is justified against minorities who are in accordance of rights with the stereotypes of criminals. Justin Volpe and the other police officers were justified concord to the institutional culture to utilise to physical and psychological abuse against the victim. Such actions according to deontology would be ethically not permitted due to several reasons. Som e duties are universal according to the ethical system like the right to protect innocent race (Delattre, 2004). It focuses on the nature of actions rather than determining the implications. Hence it is essential that the police act as guardians of innocent people. They cannot apply excessive force against suspects because it is based upon their stereotypes and perceptions. Deontology also uses the intrinsic values of specific actions in order to determine their ethical nature. In addition the Abner Louima case demonstrates the justification of deception and wile against criminal offenders. This is because police work is deemed to be a dangerous and violent environment in which loyalty and dedication supersede the legal concerns and processes (Delattre, 2004). Acts of mess up perpetrated by officers are tolerated with a strict code of loyalty. Anyone who resists such a code faces severe implications by other police officers. The police culture is often believed to have a set of core values that assistance to shape its identity. A large number of police officers perceive the general unexclusive with distrust and alarm. Hence stereotypes influence police officers to initiate brutal actions against people who might not have perpetrated an offense (DeSantis, 2002). The general public is defined as dishonest. Force is an important component of police culture because it is defined in terms of defensive purposes. A perceived flagellum means that police officers can apply force in order to safeguard their interests (Johnson, 2004). This threat can not necessarily be a physical danger to the officer but it can involve comical or uncooperative behaviors and actions. Force is used because it serves to implement the law in an efficient and effective manner. In addition, it sponsors to restore the dignity and respect of police officers (Johnson, 2004). It is considered to be a lesson to criminal offenders and perpetrators who have broken the law. Some police offi cers consider themselves to be the victims because of their low pay, scummy working conditions, and legal policies. These variables help to create a victim complex which can be countered only by adhering to a set of pick rules and regulations. Some police officers believe that criminals do not deserve access to civil liberties. Hence force is legitimized because the general public will eventually seek to support the police departments. These officers believe that law abiding citizens do not need to be victims of their actions. The Louima case demonstrates that none of the actions by the police officers were morally defensible or good. Deontology argues that certain actions are ethical because they are based upon prohibitions. Hence the brutal assault on Louima was not justified because it was based upon mere suspicion and stereotypes. However deontology does not apply a moral absolutism in its principles and approaches. The use of force against hardcore criminals like rapists, ped ophiles, and drug traffickers would be required in certain circumstances. In addition, if force was applied for self self-renunciation then the police officer would be perfectly justified in using it. Police discretion has often been identified as a mechanism that can be abused in several ways. Their ability to make decisions is enhanced through this process because it helps them to respond to specific situations. Hence deontology would legitimize the police brutality in the Louima case. The police officers acted using their own discretionary abilities when they targeted the offender (Johnson, 2004). The moral actions were perfectly in line with this line of reasoning. This is due to the fact that the officers were assaulted during the scuffle at the bar. Hence the natural answer would be to act against suspected offenders to uphold the honor and dignity of the police officers.ConclusionPolice brutality has been a major(ip) problem in the United States as demonstrated by the Loui ma case of 1997. A major ethical dilemma was the frequent misuse of police powers against criminal offenders. often police brutality occurs because of the pervasive nature of institutional culture. The occupational hazards associated with policing legitimize the frequent application of force against suspects. These suspects can be declared criminals if they give out to specific stereotypes and profiles of the police officers. Many police officers use force as a means to uphold their dignity and esteem. They believe that disobedience to the law is tantamount to challenge to the authority of the police officers. Some police officers believe that they are victimized by excessive public interference and poor working conditions. Hence force becomes legitimized against criminals while protecting the rights of innocent people. Deontology is an ethical system that believes in the appropriate nature of rules and regulations. Hence a high moral imperative is used in order to justify ethica l principles. Deontological ethics in the above case would argue that the actions of police officers were not justified. They went against the due process and rule of law. In addition, they were based upon suspicion and apprehension as the police officers needed to respond to public attacks. However an alternative explanation would be that the officers were under stress since they were in the middle of a fight. Hence the application of force could be justified because they were acting on their own discretion.